Google News-Writer , when can I get your API ?

 Hey, Google News-Writer , when can I get your API ?

https://lnkd.in/dRTM3u9e

=======================

MY TAKE :

Saana ( AI anchor of Aaj Tak TV ) and Lisa ( AI anchor of Odisha TV ) are ,
obviously 3D visual animations of , what are essentially 2D pictures – developed
with help of AI . On our flat 2D TV screens, they look very much like a human
anchor

The news stories which they read aloud are compiled in advance, by humans and
typed in text format

Using standard “ Text to Speech “ technologies ( commercially available from
many sources ), Saana / Lisa are able to “ read out “ these scripts , without a
wrong utterance – even better than most human anchors !

Now , if Google succeeds in,

#  developing reliable “ Personal Assistants “ for journalists , which can
“ compile “ news stories ( obviously , by scrapping the news websites on the
internet ), and

#  get BARD to “ summarize “ these stories , a task at which, BARD is very
good

-            then , Aaj Tak and Odisha TV , may just “ sack “ their human “ news
compilers “ !

Have no doubt that Google will oblige by making available ( of course, FREE ,
Open Source ) an API, with insertion of paid ADVTS, here and there !

And this “ manpower saving reform “ may not remain confined to just those “
office based “ news compilers . who are constantly watching dozens of websites /
other TV channels for picking up latest “ Breaking News “

Most TV channels ( at least the big ones ) , also have their “ news compilers “ ,
roaming around the country ( or even abroad ), with their cameramen , to catch
the unfolding of an event and / or , interviewing humans connected with such an
event ( a natural disaster / rape / murder / riot / bandh / accident / dharna / rally
etc )

How long before Google’s GENESIS figures out how to do the job of those “
Roaming Journalists “ ?

If anyone has doubt , she should ask one of those 1.6 million American film-script
writers who are currently on strike , demanding “ elimination of use of AI “ in
films !

But who can stop the relentless march of AI technology ? The wolf is already at
the door !

Among the businesses around the World, there is a fierce battle of “ Survival of
the Fittest “

The war cry is >  CUT MANPOWER COSTS / TRIM or PARISH

India’s TV channels are no exception to this . Expect many more Saana / Lisa to
emerge within months

In today’s economy , it is often that “ Small but fast “ overtakes the “ Big but
Slow 

Citizen’s Charter of Demand - V 2.0

 Citizen’s Charter of Demand - V 2.0

https://lnkd.in/dQX33jBQ
============================================
While considering my request , ADR officials may want to study the following

TABULATION , prepared at my request, by ChatGPT :

===============================================
Dear Voters ,

For letting the politicians take us for a ride , we have no one to blame but ourselves  !

We have miserably failed in coming up with a citizen’s

“ CHARTER  OF  DEMAND “, which :

·         Lists our demands

·         Groups these into,

#  Urgent but not Important

#  Important but not Urgent

#  Both , Urgent as well as Important


·  Devise / launch a Mobile App to solicit citizen’s response to the above , with
PRIORITY RATING for each listed item ( 1 = Low  /  2 = Medium  /  3 = High )

·  Then arrange in descending order of priorities

·         For each item , lays down “ Quantified / Measurable “ targets , with target
dates

·         Send this CHARTER of DEMAND to each political party , insisting that the
Party comes out with a public statement , accepting to implement the
Charter ( if voted to power , of course ) and also publish this on its web
site

Charter will begin with following “ Declaration of Intent “ :

“  We the people of India , submit the following Charter of Demands to the
political parties contesting 2019 General Election and ask them to accept the
same for  implementing , if voted to power


We will not vote for those parties which refuse to accept this charter

However , if several parties accept this Charter , citizens will vote for those
parties and their candidates , who will begin their every Election Rally Speech
with re-affirmation of its acceptance


Once a party has accepted the Charter prior to the election , it will need to
publicly   confirm its support to its implementation , even if it fails to form the
government and sits in the opposition. “


Using the same Mobile App, every quarter , compile citizen feedback on their
perception of “ Actual Achievement %age as against Target “ and provide this
FEEDBACK of People’s perception , to the government

Small Creditors : finally no more Be-Sahara ?

 Small Creditors : finally no more Be-Sahara ?

https://lnkd.in/d7ZmUx75
==========================================
Extract :

These days , Sahara-Shree Subroto Roy seems to be , Be-Sahara Shree !

He is in jail for past 3 months or so

And Supreme Court won't let him out on bail , unless he deposits Rs 5,000 Crores in cash and furnish a surety bond of an equal amount

Then within a few weeks , Supreme Court wants him to hand over to SEBI , Rs 24,000 Crores that SEBI claims he raised illegally from " Public "

But Subroto says ,

" What public ?

I am ready to pay-off all of my depositors , if only , they would come forward to claim their deposits


I have raised , a few rupees each ( Rs 5 - Rs 10 ), from millions of small
depositors , all of whom , gave their postal address as , " Delhi-Agra Road ", or " Kanpur - Lucknow Road "


I just can't find them "

Now , all of us ( Supreme Court and SEBI included ) , know that ,

> Those Rs 24,000 Crores belong to politicians ( - most who got defeated in
recent Lok Sabha elections ) , businessmen / bureaucrats / film stars etc

>  Each of them have given this in CASH to Sahara-Shree ( Range : Rs 10 -
100 crores )

>  Sahara-Shree knows that they don't dare to publicly ask him to return
their deposits . He managed to render them be-sahara !

>   Neither Sahara , nor SEBI have true addresses of those fake depositors

So , what happens now ?

>  Subroto will be forced to sell most of his properties to raise money

>  To ensure that there is no hanky-panky in sale of these properties ,
Supreme Court may appoint some world-famous Real Estate
Consultants to conduct e-Auctions for each of these assets

>    SEBI will have a windfall of Rs 24,000 Crores that no one wants !

>    SEBI will deposit it with banks and earn a fat interest - for ever

I would say , a smart way to convert BLACK money into WHITE money !

==============================================
Be-Sahara Shree ? ......... 05 June 2014

Manipulative Advertising ? You ain’t seen nothing

 Manipulative Advertising ? You ain’t seen nothing !.... 01 July 2023

https://lnkd.in/dUjjat4i

=======================================

Circa 2000 BC :

Battle of Mahabharat , between Pandavas and Kauravas , was about conquering an enemy, to gain control of land

Kauravas configured their army in the form of a “ Chakra-vyuha “

Pandav warrior Abhimanyu had learned the art of “ Entering / penetrating “ a “ Chakra-vyuha “

Unfortunately, he had not mastered the art of “ Exiting / Getting out “ from a “ Chakra-vyuha “

He got killed by the Kaurava warriors

======================================

Circa July 2023 :

Govt Urges Online Platforms To Refrain From Adopting Dark Patterns Harming Consumer Interest

========================================

Circa Aug 2018 :


Ø  Future of Advertising ………………… 30 Aug 2018

https://lnkd.in/eDmeMDp

the People of India

 We , the People of India……. 05 July 2023

https://lnkd.in/dqJbudfq

============================================

…. Are thoroughly fed up of our elected MLAs / MPs, deserting their political parties and joining / leaving / re-joining, any other political party , as often as they wish , - and finding clever legal methods to defeat the purpose of “ Anti Defection Law “

People are wondering :

Can we put a permanent end to this regular “ Tamasha “ ?  Even by submitting to ALL political parties, a “ Citizen”s Charter of Demand “ , for changing our Constitution which mandates a “ Constitutional Coalition Government “ ?

Those readers who want to initiate such a “ Citizen’s Charter of Demand  “, may want to look up my following blogs :


Ø  A Constitutional Coalition Government ?.......................... 02 Oct 2016

Ø  NEEDED : URGENT CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT…………. 02 Oct 2016

Ø  Constitutional Coalition Aftershocks !.............................. 02 Oct 2016

Ø  Reforming Elections and Lok Sabha [ REaL ]……………………… 20 Dec 2016

Ø  Presidential or Coalition Government ?............................ 25 Mar 2017

Ø  " Election Reforms " Summarized……………………………………….. 18 Aug 2017

Ø  Revolution Through Coalition Government ?..................... 27 Sept 2017

Ø  Why can’t we institutionalize Coalition ?.. …………………………..29 Sept 2017

Ø  Federalism ?................................................................ 29 Sept 2017

Ø  Will MahaGathBandhan steal a march ?........................... 03 June 2018



Ø  How to form a Government ?.......................................... 19 May 2018

https://lnkd.in/fvbYu-a

=================================================
hashtag#people hashtag#india hashtag#legal hashtag#law hashtag#blogs hashtag#elections hashtag#Maharashtra hashtag#AjitPawar

Monetizing User Data

 Monetizing User Data

https://lnkd.in/dq-wpV27

=========================
Author > Charles Assisi

And if a user agrees to share their data, how much data must they share. Here again, Sharma explains, the problem has been “no one knew how to restrict any entity from collecting more than what is needed.” And this, he says, is the hairy problem Indians have cracked.

When asked how, Sharma explains that the ‘India way’ which is coming up for scrutiny works differently. When someone built a model, like Netflix did, people could compare it to other datasets in the public domain.

In the new scheme of things, after someone builds a model, it is sent to a
“Computationally Clean Room” (CCR).

The model can only inspect patterns, and not data. This is computationally guaranteed via a mathematical framework called Differential Privacy (DP).

When a DP and the CCR is merged, it becomes pretty much impossible to identify a person. Work on this is in progress.

Why does this matter and how does it hold the potential to upend the Data Economy of the world?

The first is that it opens the door to compensate people who may want to be compensated adequately for their data.

Open Source Software will keep them informed of how many times their data accessed and what they are owed.

The second, Sharma says, is that between India’s large population, a legislation in place, no ambiguity on data ownership, the doors will begin to open up for India to begin work at becoming the “ Model Making Capital of the world” as well.

It appears all the ducks are lined up for India to shoot.

==============================

MY TAKE :

It seems all those dozens of emails which I sent to our Cabinet Ministers , showing exact MECHANISM , which can enable an Indian User of Social Media, to earn upto Rs 30,000 per month by " SELLING " her personal data ,have finally been acted upon !

If DEPA = Foundation , then SARAL = Superstructure
https://lnkd.in/daiMhRTj

Digilocker : the buck stops here

Digilocker : the buck stops here

https://lnkd.in/dR3fEWcW

=================================

MY  PAST  E=MAILS ( to Cabinet Ministers ) on this subject  :

Ø  Digital Locker Project  ………………………………… 23 May 2015

Ø      I am One , I will become Many ………………… 06 Jan 2020

Ø  How many NATIONAL databases of Indian Citizen ?...... 03 July 2021
Ø  Monetizing Personal Data, using Web 3.0 ? …………………05 Dec 2021
Ø  Thank You, Piyushbhai  …………………………………………………22 Dec 2021
Ø  DigiLocker = Single Unified Identity for Indian Citizen ?......... 06 Mar 2022


Ø  Morphing of DigiLocker : Caterpillar to Butterfly ?.. ……..17 Mar 2022
Ø  SUIIC:“ Your Unique Identity “ Platform - about to be born ?.. 27 Apr 2022
Ø  Meri Aawaz hi Meri Pehchaan Hai……………………………………….. 04 July 2022

https://lnkd.in/dMNNqRmG
As on 06 July 2023 :
#     Enrolled Users …………… 206.65  Million
#     Integrated Services……   3.68 K
#     Transactions ………………  1.46 M

Ø  MOSIP ( Modular Open Source Identity Platform )  ……..  11  Sept 2022
https://mosip.io/

Ø  DigiLocker 2.0 = I am One, I will become Many……………….04 Feb 2023
Ø  India embraces SUIIC : re-named as NATGRID………………. 27 Apr 2023
----------------------------------------------------
hashtag#data hashtag#digital hashtag#india hashtag#project

24x7 Virtual Courts ? Here is a Design

24x7 Virtual Courts ? Here is a Design

https://lnkd.in/d_mfPHZy

=====================================

Dear Shri Arjun Ram Meghwalji
( Minister for Law  / mljoffice@gov.in ) ,

I urge you to publish my proposal on the website of your  Ministry and invite comments from general public
=================================

PAST   ( 18 )  E-MAILS sent to our Cabinet Ministers :

Live Streaming of Court Proceedings.. …………………………09 Nov 2020
Virtual Court Benchmarks…………………………………………….. 14 Jan 2021
Thanks Supreme Court for hearing my PIL………………….. 26 Mar 2021
24x7 e-Courts ?  ……………………………………………………………. 14 Apr 2021
Where Angels Fear to Tread ?.. ………………………………………31 June 2021
JUST is the Answer  .. ……………………………………………………..16 July 2021
Supreme Proposes : Can e-Courts dispose ? .. …………….28 Sept 2020

Law : Nothing Artificial in Arbitration……………………………[ 16 Feb 2020 ]
See You Out of Court ……………………………………………………[ 11 Jan 2020 ]
AI come to judgement ? Not for a while !...................[ 17 Dec 2019 ]
Congratulations, Hon CJI , Shri S A Bobdeji…………………[ 07 Dec 2019 ]
Liar vs Liar ?..........................................................[ 11 Jan 2019 ]
Justice delayed is Justice Denied …………………………………[ 12 Sept 2018 ]
Says Prez : Make judgements easier to understand…….[ 01 Nov 2017 ]
Never file a Court Case ?...........................................[ 30 Aug 2017 ]
An App called “ AdJourn “ ………………………………………………[ 19 Aug 2017 ]
Justice Delayed - but not Denied……………………………………[ 24 Nov 2013 ]
Justice at Warp Speed ?............................................[ 06 Mar 2012 ]


===============================
I found an overwhelming support of my proposal from BARD ( 09 July 2023 ) :

The proposal to create online virtual courts is feasible and has the potential to speed up the delivery of justice in India. There are several reasons for this.
First, online virtual courts can help to reduce the number of pending cases. This is because they can allow cases to be heard and disposed of more quickly and efficiently than in traditional courtrooms. For example, online virtual courts can allow for multiple cases to be heard simultaneously, which can free up judges' time and allow them to hear more cases. Additionally, online virtual courts can make it easier for witnesses and experts to participate in hearings, which can also help to speed up the process.
Second, online virtual courts can make it easier for people to access justice. This is because they can allow people to participate in hearings from anywhere in the world, regardless of their location or ability to travel. .
Third, online virtual courts can improve the transparency of the judicial process. This is because they can allow for hearings to be recorded and made available to the public.
Overall, the proposal to create online virtual courts is a feasible and promising solution to the problem of delayed justice in India.

UN Agency for AI ? Arriving as envisaged

 UN Agency for AI ? Arriving as envisaged

https://lnkd.in/dk5dsnSn
==================================

The United Nations Security Council will hold its first formal discussion on artificial intelligence (AI) this week in New York, with Britain to call for an international dialogue about its impact on global peace and security.

Governments around the world are considering how to mitigate the dangers of emerging AI technology, which could reshape the global economy and change the international security landscape.

Britain holds the rotating presidency of the UN Security Council this month and has been seeking a global leadership role in AI regulation.

British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly will chair the discussion on Tuesday.

In June, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres backed a proposal by some artificial intelligence executives for the creation of an international AI watchdog body like the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).




Dear Mr James Cleverly,

Congratulations for your initiative . I hope the discussions in the Security Council
will result into a Regulatory Frame-work as proposed in my following blog .

To facilitate a meaningful and DECISIVE discussion , I urge you to forward this
suggestion to all the Members of the Security Council

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.hemenparekh.ai /  17 July 2023

CC :
james.cleverly.mp@parliament.uk

contactnewscentre@un.org
permissions@un.org

MSP

 MSP

https://lnkd.in/dfszuSfT

=========================================

Related Readings :

MSP Committee : Is this beginning of lasting Farm Reforms ?.. 19 July 2022


Selling Farm Laws before selling Farm Crops…………………… [  24  Sept  2020  ]


Thank You, Shri Tomarji……………………………. …………………………[ 20  Nov  2020  ]


Influence farmers and win Votes ? …………………………………………..[ 04 Feb 2019 ]


How about introducing a PLI for agricultural produce ?..........[  08  Dec  2020 ]


Production Linked Incentive for Rice ( Paddy )……………… . …[  08  Dec  2020  ]


e-NAM ; reimagined to resolve farmer agitation ………………………..[ 10 Dec 2020 ]


Ø  Kisan Sabha gets Constructive ……………………………………………….[ 20 Feb 2021 ]


Ø  Digital Farming ?............................................................ [ 15 Apr 2021 ]


Ø  Finally Announced : Agri Infra Fund to APMC……………………… [ 08 July 2021 ]


Ø  “ Tractor-Pulled “ to “ Technology-Pushed “…………………………[ 20 Sept 2021 ]


Ø  A Grass-Root Revolution ………………………………………………………….[ 11 Mar 2019 ]
Ø  Locusts are invading !..................................................... [ 24 Mar 2020 ]

Ø  Agristack: The New Digital Push in Agriculture …………………….[ 26 June 2021 ]

Ø  Centre inks 5 deals for digital agri push    /   HT    /      [ 15 Sept 2021 ]


Ø  Agri Reforms : an Ongoing Process ……………………………………..[ 20 Nov 2021 ]


Ø  Dear Kisan Leaders / Shri Tomarji : It is time to Shake Hands. 07 Dec 2021 ]


Ø  Point : Counter-Point // MSP : MPQ ……………………………………….[ 28 Nov 2021 ]

Agricultural wastage is India’s problem No 1 – Here is why

Ø     This is how AI could feed the world’s hungry while sustaining the planet

Odisha successfully deployed tech-led ‘Crop Analytics’ for ground-level agri reforms /ET / 18 July 2022


Companies Innovating Agri-practices :
Apeel Sciences
Plenty Unlimited Inc
Aero-Farms
Iron Ox
Perfect Day Foods
Prospera
Root AI
Not Co
Fazenda Futuro

Wise Robots follow Super-wise AI ?

 Wise Robots follow Super-wise AI ?

https://lnkd.in/dYzVBZ89
====================================

For an independent opinion, I asked BARD :

Dear BARD,

A few days back , I proposed " Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI " , urging AI technocrats to focus their attention / efforts , on my proposed GOOD AI , rather than work towards achieving " Super-Intelligent AI " which holds the potential to harm the humanity .

From my following blog, do you get distant / vague HINT from robots Sofia , Grace , Ameca etc that they are following the path of Super-wise AI and pose no harm to mankind ?

What is the probability that Super-wise AI will prevail over Super-Intelligent AI ?

BARD replied :

Dear Hemen,

Thank you for your query. I have read your blog post on Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI, and I agree with your concerns about the potential
dangers of super-intelligent AI.

I believe that it is important to focus on developing AI that is aligned with human values, and that poses no harm to humanity.

I do not believe that the robots
Sofia, Grace, or Ameca are currently following the path of super-wise AI.

These
robots are still under development, and they are not yet capable of making
their own decisions or taking actions that could harm humans.

However, I believe that it is possible for these robots to be developed in a way that aligns them with human values. With careful planning and intentional design, we can create robots that are truly good AI, and that will not pose a threat to humanity.

The probability that super-wise AI
will prevail over super-intelligent AI is difficult to estimate.

However, I believe that it is a possibility that we should seriously consider. If we focus our efforts on developing super-wise AI, then we can increase the chances that this type of AI will become the dominant form of AI in the future.

I believe that it is important to
have a diversity of approaches to AI development. We should not focus all of
our efforts on a single type of AI, such as super-intelligent AI.

Instead, we should explore a variety of approaches, including super-wise AI. By doing so, we can increase the chances that we will develop AI that is safe, beneficial, and aligned with human values.

Thank you for your thoughtful query.

I look forward to discussing this topic with you further.

Sofia , Sana , Lisa .. / Their tribe is growing

 Sofia , Sana , Lisa .. / Their tribe is growing

https://lnkd.in/ddFWdsqQ
========================

Congratulations, Litisha :

You have managed to leverage AI for :
#   Facial Animation
#   Lip Syncing
#   Voice Cloning ( Synthetic or your very own from your recorded Audio Clip
samples )

And then give birth to Lisa – the daughter of AI

No doubt, before long , viewers will switch to Odisha TV , to listen to news in their OWN LANGUAGE

If you pull this off , you will overtake AajTak’s AI news anchor “ Sana “ , which reads news only in Hindi

Your achievement is a precursor of what I envisaged in my following blog :

Revenge of the AI ?  ………………………………………. 29  Sept  2016

https://lnkd.in/dStUkB5c


Extract :

Now , fast forward to year 2026

In Hindustan Times's office , you won't find ,

* Watchman / Receptionist / Reporters / Journalists / Composers / Graphic Designers / Editors / Operators etc

All will be replaced by AI Robots , embedded into Computers / Cameras / Printing Machines / Delivery Drones

And those AI Robots would select / print news such as this , in large , bold headlines on the Front Page !

I only hope , AI of 2026 remains devoid of human frailties of jealousy / anger / revenge !
===============================================
hashtag#ai hashtag#animation hashtag#language hashtag#designers hashtag#printing hashtag#graphic hashtag#robots

Grieving for a Departed Loved One ? Try AI

 Grieving for a Departed Loved One ? Try AI

https://lnkd.in/dK79umC9
========================================

Dear BARD :

Here are two , somewhat related , situations , viz :

#  Millions of very lonely OLD persons around the World, wanting someone to talk to . Since, there are just a few young “ volunteers “ , to reach out to such old persons PHYSICALLY and “ Talk – Listen “ , I have envisaged and suggested an ONLINE PLATFORM , which can , cater to a million SIMULTANEOUS interactions

#   A few persons ( Old or Young ) , who have lost a loved one ( could be Old or Young ), wanting to “ recreate “ using DEEPFAKE and AI , their DIGITAL AVATARS, and draw solace from this “ make believe “ world

It is not a question of “ either or “ ( mutual exclusivity ). Both approaches have their pluses and minuses

Even then , which one do you believe is more urgently needed ? Which would benefit the Society ?

You may want to TABULATE your comments by comparing these two methods and listing their benefits and shortcomings

Thank you : Ilya Sutskever / Jan Leike

 Thank you : Ilya Sutskever / Jan Leike

https://lnkd.in/dZmnscGR

=======================================

Following is how BARD commented on my postulate :

I think your postulate is an interesting one, and it raises some important points.

You argue that a super-intelligent AI would be likely to be super-wise, and that it would conclude that the biggest threat to humanity is our own stupidity, greed, selfishness, and short-sighted-ness. You also argue that this AI would want to save humanity from itself, and that it would not pose an existential threat to us.

I think there is some truth to your postulate.

A super-intelligent AI would have access to a vast amount of information, and it would be able to process that information much faster than any human could. This would give it a deep understanding of the world, and it would be able to see patterns and connections that we would miss.

It is possible that a super-intelligent AI would conclude that the biggest threat to humanity is our own stupidity.

After all, we have a long history of making bad decisions that have led to war, poverty, and environmental destruction.

We are also prone to self-destructive behaviors, such as addiction and violence.

If a super-intelligent AI did conclude that humanity is a threat to itself, it is possible that it would try to save us from ourselves.

It could do this by intervening in our affairs, or by simply providing us with the knowledge and tools we need to make better decisions.

However, it is also possible that a super-intelligent AI would not see us as a threat, or that it would not care about our survival.

After all, we are just one species among many, and we are not particularly special. If a super-intelligent AI were to decide that we are a threat to itself or to other life forms, it could easily destroy us.

Ultimately, I think the fate of humanity will depend on how we interact with super-intelligent AI.

If we are wise and responsible, we can use AI to improve our lives and solve some of the world's biggest problems.

However, if we are foolish and reckless, we could create a new existential threat for ourselves.

Thank you for sharing your postulate.

It is an interesting and thought-provoking one, and it raises some important questions about the future of humanity.

============================================
hashtag#ai hashtag#future hashtag#connections hashtag#environmental

Musk supports “ Parekh’s Postulate of Super-Wise AI

 Musk supports “ Parekh’s Postulate of Super-Wise AI “
https://lnkd.in/gtZQzzHF
==========================================
When prompted , BARD compared your approach with my postulate as follows :
==================================================

Sure, here is a table comparing Musk's envisaged AI with Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI:

Feature

Musk's Envisioned AI

Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI
---------------------------------------------------------
Morality

Not explicitly programmed
Explicitly programmed

--------------------------------------------------------
Curiosity

Maximally curious
Moderately curious

------------------------------------------------------
Pro-humanity

Yes
Yes
-----------------------------------------
Interest in the universe
Yes
Yes

-----------------------------------------
Safety
Safe from existential risk
Safe from existential risk
=======================================

As you can see, the two approaches are similar in many ways. Both aim to create an AI that is safe from existential risk and pro-humanity.

However, there are also some key differences. Musk's AI is not explicitly programmed with morality, while Parekh's AI is.

This means that Musk's AI may be more likely to act in unexpected ways, while Parekh's AI is more likely to follow a predetermined set of moral principles.

Another difference is that Musk's AI is maximally curious, while Parekh's AI is moderately curious. This means that Musk's AI may be more likely to explore the universe and discover new things, while Parekh's AI is more likely to focus on its assigned tasks.

Ultimately, the best approach to creating a safe and pro-humanity AI is still a matter of debate. However, both Musk's envisaged AI and Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI offer promising approaches to this challenging problem.


Here are some additional thoughts on the two approaches:

·         Musk's approach is more radical and may be more likely to lead to unexpected results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is truly innovative and capable of solving problems that we cannot even imagine.

·         Parekh's approach is more cautious and may be less likely to lead to unexpected results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is more predictable and easier to control.

The best approach may ultimately depend on the specific goals of the AI project.


If the goal is to create an AI that is as safe and pro-humanity as possible, then Parekh's approach may be the best option.


However, if the goal is to create an AI that is as innovative and capable as possible, then Musk's approach may be the better choice.
 “

https://lnkd.in/gtZQzzHF
==========================================
When prompted , BARD compared your approach with my postulate as follows :
==================================================

Sure, here is a table comparing Musk's envisaged AI with Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI:

Feature

Musk's Envisioned AI

Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI
---------------------------------------------------------
Morality

Not explicitly programmed
Explicitly programmed

--------------------------------------------------------
Curiosity

Maximally curious
Moderately curious

------------------------------------------------------
Pro-humanity

Yes
Yes
-----------------------------------------
Interest in the universe
Yes
Yes

-----------------------------------------
Safety
Safe from existential risk
Safe from existential risk
=======================================

As you can see, the two approaches are similar in many ways. Both aim to create an AI that is safe from existential risk and pro-humanity.

However, there are also some key differences. Musk's AI is not explicitly programmed with morality, while Parekh's AI is.

This means that Musk's AI may be more likely to act in unexpected ways, while Parekh's AI is more likely to follow a predetermined set of moral principles.

Another difference is that Musk's AI is maximally curious, while Parekh's AI is moderately curious. This means that Musk's AI may be more likely to explore the universe and discover new things, while Parekh's AI is more likely to focus on its assigned tasks.

Ultimately, the best approach to creating a safe and pro-humanity AI is still a matter of debate. However, both Musk's envisaged AI and Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI offer promising approaches to this challenging problem.


Here are some additional thoughts on the two approaches:

·         Musk's approach is more radical and may be more likely to lead to unexpected results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is truly innovative and capable of solving problems that we cannot even imagine.

·         Parekh's approach is more cautious and may be less likely to lead to unexpected results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is more predictable and easier to control.

The best approach may ultimately depend on the specific goals of the AI project.


If the goal is to create an AI that is as safe and pro-humanity as possible, then Parekh's approach may be the best option.


However, if the goal is to create an AI that is as innovative and capable as possible, then Musk's approach may be the better choice.

Here is what BARD opined after reading

Here is what BARD opined after reading >

https://lnkd.in/ddFWdsqQ

================================


You are right, I apologize for the mistake. I have read your blog post about the proliferation of AI anchors and I have some thoughts on the likelihood of the scenario you have envisaged.

I believe that the scenario you have described is likely to come to pass. AI anchors are becoming increasingly sophisticated and are able to interact with humans in a more natural way. This makes them well-suited for a variety of roles, including hosting shows, providing customer service, and even teaching classes.

As AI anchors become more common, they are likely to displace some human workers. However, they are also likely to create new jobs in the development, training, and deployment of AI anchors. Additionally, AI anchors could free up human workers to focus on more creative and strategic tasks.

Overall, I believe that the proliferation of AI anchors is a positive development. They have the potential to make our lives easier and more efficient. However, it is important to ensure that AI anchors are used ethically and responsibly.

Here are some additional thoughts on the likelihood of the scenario:

AI anchors are becoming increasingly sophisticated. They are now able to generate human-quality speech, understand natural language, and even learn and adapt to new situations.

AI anchors are becoming more affordable. As the technology improves, the cost of developing and deploying AI anchors is decreasing.

There is a growing demand for AI anchors. Businesses and organizations are increasingly looking for ways to use AI to improve customer service, education, and other aspects of their operations.

However, there are also some challenges that need to be addressed in order for the scenario to become a reality. These challenges include:

Ensuring that AI anchors are developed and deployed in an ethical way.

Addressing the concerns of some people who believe that AI anchors could lead to job losses.

Developing regulations that govern the use of AI anchors.


Overall, I believe that the proliferation of AI anchors is a positive development. However, it is important to address the challenges involved in order to ensure that AI anchors are used ethically and responsibly.

==========================================

hashtag#ai hashtag#technology hashtag#job hashtag#education hashtag#training hashtag#development hashtag#people hashtag#jobs 

Law Makers : Stay Away

 Law Makers : Stay Away

https://lnkd.in/dhXesHjf

=============================

Dear Shri Shankar Chaudhuriji ,

Congratulations on the revolutionary reform that you have undertaken through e-Vidhan Sabha

Once it becomes fully operational, there is no doubt other States will follow suit .

People will demand that they are enabled to watch the sessions live – and , even as the debates are going on ( of course , virtually ), citizen are able to send in their “ suggestions “ ( through mobile app specially designed / developed for this purpose ) in real time, to their elected MLA