Musk supports “ Parekh’s Postulate of Super-Wise AI “
https://lnkd.in/gtZQzzHF
==========================================
When prompted , BARD compared your approach with my postulate as follows :
==================================================
Sure, here is a table comparing Musk's envisaged AI with Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI:
Feature
Musk's Envisioned AI
Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI
---------------------------------------------------------
Morality
Not explicitly programmed
Explicitly programmed
--------------------------------------------------------
Curiosity
Maximally curious
Moderately curious
------------------------------------------------------
Pro-humanity
Yes
Yes
-----------------------------------------
Interest in the universe
Yes
Yes
-----------------------------------------
Safety
Safe from existential risk
Safe from existential risk
=======================================
As
you can see, the two approaches are similar in many ways. Both aim to
create an AI that is safe from existential risk and pro-humanity.
However, there are also some key differences. Musk's AI is not explicitly programmed with morality, while Parekh's AI is.
This
means that Musk's AI may be more likely to act in unexpected
ways, while Parekh's AI is more likely to follow a predetermined set of
moral principles.
Another difference is
that Musk's AI is maximally curious, while Parekh's AI is moderately
curious. This means that Musk's AI may be more likely to explore the
universe and discover new things, while Parekh's AI is more likely to
focus on its assigned tasks.
Ultimately,
the best approach to creating a safe and pro-humanity AI is still a
matter of debate. However, both Musk's envisaged AI and Parekh's
Postulate of Super-wise AI offer promising approaches to this
challenging problem.
Here are some additional thoughts on the two approaches:
· Musk's
approach is more radical and may be more likely to lead to unexpected
results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is
truly innovative and capable of solving problems that we cannot even
imagine.
· Parekh's approach is
more cautious and may be less likely to lead to unexpected
results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is more
predictable and easier to control.
The best approach may ultimately depend on the specific goals of the AI project.
If the goal is to create an AI that is as safe and pro-humanity as possible, then Parekh's approach may be the best option.
However,
if the goal is to create an AI that is as innovative and capable as
possible, then Musk's approach may be the better choice.
“
==========================================
When prompted , BARD compared your approach with my postulate as follows :
==================================================
Sure, here is a table comparing Musk's envisaged AI with Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI:
Feature
Musk's Envisioned AI
Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI
---------------------------------------------------------
Morality
Not explicitly programmed
Explicitly programmed
--------------------------------------------------------
Curiosity
Maximally curious
Moderately curious
------------------------------------------------------
Pro-humanity
Yes
Yes
-----------------------------------------
Interest in the universe
Yes
Yes
-----------------------------------------
Safety
Safe from existential risk
Safe from existential risk
=======================================
As you can see, the two approaches are similar in many ways. Both aim to create an AI that is safe from existential risk and pro-humanity.
However, there are also some key differences. Musk's AI is not explicitly programmed with morality, while Parekh's AI is.
This means that Musk's AI may be more likely to act in unexpected ways, while Parekh's AI is more likely to follow a predetermined set of moral principles.
Another difference is that Musk's AI is maximally curious, while Parekh's AI is moderately curious. This means that Musk's AI may be more likely to explore the universe and discover new things, while Parekh's AI is more likely to focus on its assigned tasks.
Ultimately, the best approach to creating a safe and pro-humanity AI is still a matter of debate. However, both Musk's envisaged AI and Parekh's Postulate of Super-wise AI offer promising approaches to this challenging problem.
Here are some additional thoughts on the two approaches:
· Musk's approach is more radical and may be more likely to lead to unexpected results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is truly innovative and capable of solving problems that we cannot even imagine.
· Parekh's approach is more cautious and may be less likely to lead to unexpected results. However, it also has the potential to create an AI that is more predictable and easier to control.
The best approach may ultimately depend on the specific goals of the AI project.
If the goal is to create an AI that is as safe and pro-humanity as possible, then Parekh's approach may be the best option.
However, if the goal is to create an AI that is as innovative and capable as possible, then Musk's approach may be the better choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment